Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Archeological arguments are genuine arguments.
Archeological evidence about land ownership will always create a tie between a people and that land. It's literal evidence of history in that land.
|
They are genuine arguments and are considered legal evidence in Canadian courts for establishing where Indigenous peoples have historical and traditional territories. Oral history is also considered legal evidence. I don't see why the same shouldn't apply in other parts of the world in some situation.