Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
I didn’t call the whole thing invalid, did I? I’m just suggesting that it’s worth actually reading it beyond just reading the summary as it gives better context which, imo, would have people less reluctant to put a stake in the ground
You can’t, actually, because the data they collected is from different sources and the data that is incomplete in the firearm one, which they say would change the numbers, is not relevant to the bear spray one (in which there is no similar caveat).
|
Nice to see you read the studies. Are you ready based on the conclusion of those studies to allow hikers (who the average one certainly won’t be proficient as the gun carriers in the studies) isn’t going to help.
Right now you sound like Seewhyguy in the Covid threads parsing random comments out of the studies rather than following the broad conclusions.