Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Sure, still different than hunting. Tell me, did the Parks Canada people know there was a bear there or not - did they have guns out and ready or not?
You are smarter than to suggest that this incident where bear spray was possibly ineffective means studies are wrong.
The rate of injuries for armed versus unarmed people who are attacked is the same.
|
Tell me, did the people who died know there was a bear or not? Did they think it was a ghost the whole time?
I’m just being a twat because I thought GGG telling people with actual experience they were wrong because the studies said so was funny. I’m just out for a little rip here. I obviously don’t think this disproves any studies, but I do think coming to the conclusion that one is better than the other “cause studies” is stupid without understanding the studies and what they were actually… you know… studying.
Also, what study for rate of injury? Is it the 1883 Alaska one? Cause if so you gotta read that again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius
I think PF is just on a early Tuesday evening bender.
|
My life is an early Tuesday evening bender.