View Single Post
Old 09-28-2023, 10:59 AM   #10062
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
Yeah, but what does it mean to "yield to" someone or something? I just had a quick look at the Act and a couple of other traffic websites and it's not defined anywhere. In some cases the definition is circular. The closest thing to a meaning I can find is "slow down or stop and don't proceed until it is safe to do so". There's a very good argument that once the pedestrian is on the other side of the road from the direction you are traveling, it's safe to proceed.
Yeah, I'm actually gonna put this to bed right now because it's already been legally tested: R v Schumacher, 2014 ABQB 571

If there is no interference with the pedestrian's right of way (ie: impediment of their forward progression through the crosswalk), then there should be a finding that the car did yield. So the cop in the Globe and Mail article is wrong.

https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/do...ocompletePos=1

You do not have to wait until the pedestrian fully crosses, you only have to wait until the pedestrian has passed your lane.

Another officer as quoted in a Calgary Herald article gets it right:

Quote:
“If a person has one foot off of the curb, they’re in the crosswalk,” says Staff Sgt. Paul Stacey of the Calgary police traffic section. Drivers can continue once a pedestrian has passed their lane (the obligation isn’t “curb to curb,” Stacey says) but passing a motorist already stopped at a crosswalk is dangerous — not to mention expensive: a $575 fine and four demerits.
https://calgaryherald.com/news/traff...rivers-its-you
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.

Last edited by TorqueDog; 09-28-2023 at 11:01 AM.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post: