Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
No, but you’d think that would curry me some favour with the “But TRUDEAU!!!” crowd… and yet…
|
I wouldn't write off the flack that Trudeau is getting as a rote " But Trudeau" reaction.
The article posted by calgarygeologist points out some ugly facts. The federal gov't knew about rising Indian Intelligenxe networks within Canada since 2017. CSIS had a plan to shut it down but "Ottawa" blocked that operation due to political sensitivity.
Now, it comes out from the same Gov't that blocked the shutdown that there is credible evidence that Indian played a role on murdering a man on Canadian soil, because it opposes the cause he was fighting for.
The broad theme is that a man died on Canadian soil in service to political expediency. The Trudeau government was in charge the whole time, so it and its leader, are going to wear it. Comes with being in charge. It would be the same for any party in power. A man is dead, this is a tragedy, and in political terms, a major ###### up. Under circumstances like these, accountability goes right to the top.