Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
They do report to Trudeau, and his advisor did his job by advising him what was going on and what the departments were doing about it.
Read the article, at no point does it suggest Trudeau did not act when he should have or that he instructed any other agency not to act.
Just put the bias aside and try, for a second, to see if you can intake the situation without desperately trying to find a reason why this supports your political bias.
|
Quote:
In addition, in CSIS’s original threat reduction plan, Global Affairs Canada “had committed to inform senior Indian diplomats in Canada of Mr. Singh’s activities,” NSICOP says.
But later, for political reasons, Global Affairs was mute on CSIS’s concerns in Vancouver.
“For its part, Global Affairs did not raise Mr. Singh’s activities to senior Indian diplomats,” the NSICOP document says, “because it had concerns that preparations for the Prime Minister’s trip to India were reaching a critical point and may be negatively affected by such an intervention.”
|
Global Affairs “had committed to inform senior Indian diplomats in Canada of Mr. Singh’s activities,” but decided not to intervene “because it had concerns that preparations for the Prime Minister’s trip to India were reaching a critical point and may be negatively affected by such an intervention.”
Global Affairs (Chrystia Freeland) committed to CSIS threat reduction plan, then didn’t do what they committed to because they didn’t want it to disrupt Trudeau’s trip to India.
Again, Global Affairs reports directly to Trudeau.