Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
You’re just going in circles and talking nonsense. Gaudreau is not going to look like a terrible human being if it comes out he actually was uncomfortable lol, come on.
Again, Bissonette aside, the NHLPA is investigating because they received information that young players were uncomfortable. Not from the podcast, not because Twitter users said to do it, but because that’s what they recieved. You want to pretend that isn’t evidence and young players telling their union they were uncomfortable isn’t “real” or isn’t “proof” then go nuts, but it just comes off as either being a weird Babcock fanboy or having an axe to grind with a podcast, which would be hilarious.
You don’t want to believe it, and you don’t like the people who first brought it up, so you’ve decided to reserve judgement until you can’t logically find any reason to deny it, while judging the hell out of the people who brought the stuff forward and calling young players who were uncomfortable liars or, worse, just pretending they don’t exist at all. Hilarious.
|
If it comes out Gaudreau lied about what happened he will look bad. I agree if he came out saying he was uncomfortable he wouldn't look bad at all so no reason to lie about it at all.
I am fine believing that it happened so no that is another lie as usual from you. What I have said is that there is nothing to tell us what has happened so why not wait until that comes out first before making things up. That is a pretty reasonable statement but because you have a personal issue with me you are trying to making it out to be more than it is.
I am not judging anyone and certainly not calling young players that came out anything. I haven't commented on any player outside of Jenner, gaudreau and Werenski.