Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
If we’re reserving judgement until the investigation is done, why are you already judging the podcast guys? You had no issue calling them empty accusations or saying PB only defends guys that “tow” his line, which is complete nonsense. Just because you haven’t seen the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist, and judging the SC guys while falling over yourself to avoid judging Babcock looks silly.
And again, media statements aren’t evidence of anything. You can say they are, but they aren’t. Players from the Blackhawks made the same kind of statements.
I didn’t think it was a secret that PR isn’t some exercise in honesty. Those media statements could be 100% honest, they could also be 100% designed to avoid rocking the boat at all costs, or players who don’t want anything to do with another Babcock story.
|
I am judging Biz Nasty on the comments he made. I have never once said that what they said didn't happen, I have said there is no proof at this point that it did happen and I will wait until that comes out before believing them blindly. I also said the way they have handled it is poor and the shove it up your ass comment shows that to me.
Unless you are claiming that Gaudreau, Jenner and Werenski are all lying, with no benefit and a ton to lose if they are, then yes their statement are proof of how they felt in their interactions with Babcock.