Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK
Awful take. That was a 6 year contract, so not sure what linkage you are trying to create.
You seem to be a genius after the fact as opposed to making good calls on players and contracts.
|
So it should have been an 8 year contract and that’s a better comparable?
The risk here is that it’s a guy with only one year of NHL. They obviously liked what they saw, but it’s certainly not unheard of for rookies to look great and then plateau or get worse.