Quote:
Originally Posted by Bent Wookie
Although I hate to link news articles, please refresh your memory.
http://http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/Art..._name=&no_ads=
The trial was much more indepth then the article but touches briefly on the when the force became excessive (still open for debate as the difference in time between the first and 2nd shot was so small that expert witnesses testified that it was too short for the human brain to process the outcome of the first shot and make a conscious decision to fire the 2nd). Again read up on some science behind combat and policing. Dave Grossmans book, 'On Killing' is facinating. I certinaly think it would change your tune. |
Why do you hate linking to news articles? Aren't they a bit more credible (at least at face value on here) then your, or mine, or whoever else's point of view/opinion?
I actually don't know much at all about this case. But no offense wookie, until this post...you just seemed to keep telling rouge and unabomber to "read up" and "things aren't as clear cut as that" etc. Until now you really haven't provided much other information to support your point of view....