So if am I understanding this correctly, based on what everyone seems to agree on:
1) Poilievre panders to the far right.
2) The phrase dog whistle has been used in politics around the world for decades (as the Wikipedia entry attests to) when referring to a person pandering to more extreme elements, particularly when using terms and phrases that really get their attention (e.g. WEF, digital ID, etc.)
But when a reporter asks him about pandering to the far right in that way using the phrase "dog whistle", that's all of the sudden fabricating an allegation to promote a Liberal narrative. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense...
|