Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor
There's nothing fabricated about it. There was a Canadian Press article 4 days ago quoting multiple political science professors talking about that exact thing; her mistake was not being prepared for getting bogged down in semantics by knowing the names of the professors:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/poil...ries-1.6517247 |
I don't see the word dog-whistling, a term coined by Trudeau specifically a year ago on a congratulatory statement on Poilievre's inauguration of all things.
And yes Poilievre is well aware of that article considering he tweeted a reply on it.
If a reporter is using words that only Trudeau notably has been found to have used, and unable to provide an answer when called on it, and resorted to experts but couldn't name what experts said it, that's a partisan narrative.
Does Poilievre pander to the more right elements of the party? Yes as we have seen.
Is he dog-whistling? That's a fabricated narrative coined by a partisan source and a loaded question that got called out.