Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
Lanny, when will you understand that you can't get around not being able to disclose classified information by confining yourself to detailed allusions to its existence? It's still a violation - to illustrate, imagine if, in 1944, someone working on the atomic bomb talked to a reporter and said, "We're working on something to end the war, I can't call it a weapon, but there are guys who know more than me who've called it a weapon. We've got a facility out in a desert state, somewhere in the south-west, but I can't tell you exactly which one because that is a secret too, but it's not Arizona or Nevada. Oh, and I can't tell you who is working on it either, but have you noticed Oppenheimer hasn't been around much lately?"
All that would all still be privileged information that couldn't be shared, even if nothing secret was said directly. You sound like a child who thinks playing lawyer with his parents is a valid strategy to avoid punishment.
Further, these whistleblower protections you prattle on about would be relevant if Grosch was actually blowing whistles - but he's not. He's just talking about stuff he purportedly heard about that he thinks shouldn't be secret, he's not exposing criminals or revealing the price-fixing cabal behind shrinkflation. This is what makes it absurd, there's no wrong-doing to uncover EVEN IF there really are aliens being hidden by General Jack D Ripper and his posse of space cowboys. Maybe Grosch is a fraud, or delusional, or being hoaxed, but he's no whistleblower and the whole circus is a waste of time.
|
Wait. You have the audacity to say that someone prattles on then post the crap above? You're embarrassing yourself. And I mean more than usual.
You really don't have a clue what you're talking about. It was obvious before when you tried to take your original run at whistleblowers but it is even more evident with this post. You ignore reality and how things really work and live in some sick twisted fever dream created from watching movies. Even when the actual laws are referenced for you, you ignore them and continue to flap your ignorant gums about a subject that is clearly beyond you and misinterpreting historical moments before such laws existed as proof. Embarrassing.
Grush is a whistleblower because he followed the law and registered as such with ODNI and has been accepted as much by congress. He's followed the law and has been taken seriously by both bodies. He's presenting information and can provide names and details in secure facility consistent with his security clearance exactly like a number of whistleblowers before him. I'll take ODNI and congress' word for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
jammies, just curious - did you watch Grusch's interview with Ross Coulhart in May (where he came forward for the first time) and the Congressional hearings last week?
|
Of course he didn't. His mind is made up on this topic. No need to challenge what he already "knows" is wrong. Even though he continues to be wrong on almost everything he tries to bring to the discussion, he will hold fast to his beliefs and not entertain other ideas.