Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach
Actually I think it's the opposite. I understand under the law, who raped and who watched probably requires distinction as to who should go to jail and for how long. The NHL can choose to employ who it wants on the basis of conduct whether under their organization or not. IMO, if you were in that room and haven't already come forward naming everyone else and calling it a disgusting mistake to even be present, you're just as bad as the people doing it. Who are you protecting? Why should you, as an independent contractor, technically in competition with the other defendants, want to protect them? Is it because you're cowardly disgusting losers? Oh yeah, that's why.
|
They might get rid of cowardly disgusting losers or they might keep them. See Kane, Evander. I just don’t see it as clear cut that these guys are done. It isn’t as if the NHL is a model of consistent discipline.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|