Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
I read the first sentence, and that's all great. I just disagree. Do we really want bureaucrats making those decisions? I get this situation where you were entirely in favour of lockdowns, but to me that is a dangerous precedent.
|
If the bureaucrat in question has a title of "Chief Medical Officer" and they are an actual doctor then yes- In this case the politician in charge of healthcare in Alberta was in fact a lawyer, and a bad one at that. I'll take the Doctor's advice thanks!