View Single Post
Old 07-25-2023, 04:53 PM   #13671
belsarius
First Line Centre
 
belsarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cranbrook
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
That's a fact basically everywhere. Modern healthcare is more expensive and a relatively older population is also more expensive to treat. But the lack of growth in funding relative to peer countries is pretty stark:

-In 1990 Canada was #2 on the OECD in total health spending as a % of GDP and now we're 10th.

-Also in 1990, Canada was #3 in the OECD in government health spending as a % of GDP and now we're 13th.

-Since the early '90s, Canada's government spending on healthcare (as a % of GDP) has increased by about 15-20%. That pales in comparison to countries like Japan (120%), Netherlands (85%), UK (85%), Australia (65%), Germany (60%), France (60%), New Zealand (60%), and Sweden (50%).

It's clear that peer countries are investing far more heavily in improving health care than Canada is, and it shows in the quality disparity.
It's easy for people to point at Euro countries and try to say "see, privatization works" while ignoring that they also spend way more public money than us.
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).

Fuzz - "He didn't speak to the media before the election, either."
belsarius is offline   Reply With Quote