Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor
Do we really consider 80 points a success for a 10.5 million player in the first year of an 8 year contract?
I guess it depends on how defensively tight they're playing.
If they're playing river hockey I don't think 80 points does it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by memphusk
I understand that but he should be 90 plus at that salary. Anything else is a disappointment.
|
Please read the previous posts again... I was literally asked what would be a big improvement. From 55 points to 80 points is a big improvement. Please also note I said "as a minimum".
If you're asking me what a true success would be, that's a different question entirely. For that I'd put the marker at 90 as a minimum.