Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
My Krupp example was about how they lay the hammer down for dogsledding. There is an equally enforceable clause for sexual assault. It will remain to be seen if dogsledding or sexual assault is worse in the eyes of the NHL and NHL teams.
|
I don't think that is a fair comparison at all. I assume his participation in the dogsledding wasn't in question. The problem with the sexual assault allegations is that there were different levels of activity. Convicted of sexual assault, sure ban them/terminate the contract. Implicated as being in the room? I am not so sure that should lead to the same result. I may be in the minority, but I am not as comfortable with finding those guilty by association. Not so sure the NHL or the NHLPA will be good with that either.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|