Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnski
16000... ring a bell? Prove it, or retract it. Balls in your court.
|
You'll have to take that number up with Thomas Friedman and the Discovery Channel.
Quote:
|
If you think I went Shergil on you, you ain't seen nothing yet my friend. I will respect your opinions and perspectives to my dying day, but I do not respect the garbage baggage of pot shots. I can do that too, quite easily. I refrain from it. Hope you choose to as well. It isn't about a sense of humour. it just ain't funny. And certainly not worthy of your calibre of posting.
|
Sure thing, as long as you follow suit. So far your posts in this thread have been filled with potshots and you claiming information YOU are unable to backup in any shape or form.
Quote:
|
The bolded word in your post that was the most important was "anywhere". Speak to that first. As a poster has already indicated, it isn't feasible to stick a windmill up out in the blue and expect results. As for your lack of knowing what production cost are vis-a-vis the ROI, I suggest you look further. Might wake you up a bit.
|
Educate me. If you have the information, please bring it forward. The only information that I have found that addresses costs are associated with production costs of kilowatts of power, and wind power in he shape of wind farms is the lowest cost. Do you think that the costs of the windmills are not factored into these cost comparisons? If the information that I have posted is incorrect please post the correct information with supporting information. A poster of your caliber should be able to do that.
Quote:
Lanny, the general concept of geothermal is the norm right now is home/building cooling/heating. General Wiki info here. However, on a larger scale, if THAT is what you are proposing, perhaps you might be surprised to note I have already brought that up in a thread here where I have clearly supported a geothermal concept:
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=36499
And I got flak for it... larf...
|
I don't know why you got flak for anything.
Quote:
|
As for the rest of your misdirections or blatherings, sorry, I am not taking part. You can research the issues of ethanol, and the mercury in the new wave of bulbs as easily as you can post your other links. You would any way. Again, this was all based on a skimming of your posts, and you have failed to rebut anything at all. Wood bats 0..... again.
|
Okay, so you natter on about respecting opinions and perspectives, but then start tossing around words like misdirections and blatherings? Wow. Then you toss out a couple of subjects and tell ME that I should speak to these subjects when its YOU that have brought them up. Speak to some specifics that you have problems with so I understand your pespective and respond accordingly. You have provided NOTHING to rebut. To rebut something there has to be something worthy of rebutting. What should I rebut? Your incorrect information that you posted on geothermal energy? Come on man, if you want to take part in the thread, take part in the thread. Provide a little more information to your arguments and be a lot more clear on what point you're trying to make.