Is this the worst use of $40Billion in history? I am thinking so and is a fantastic working example of why wealth should not be so aggregated into the hands of so few. This is a shining example society should look to when it comes to installing caps on wealth. Yes, it may be arbitrary but personally I do not see the need for anyone to have in excess of $1 Billion. Call it $2 Billion or whatever, but fact is this moron used his personal wealth to destroy what otherwise was a useful journalistic tool. That remaining $39 or $38 Billion could have been used in so many better ways if there was such a cap.
|