Quote:
Originally Posted by stang
I’m not sure puckpedia is just a random person.
I don’t think it was a rule. Only for the compliance buyouts.
Flames bought out Stone and then re-signed him a month later.
|
I didn’t think it was a rule either. What would the rule break? If people are thinking cap circumvention, think about it from the other angle. The player makes less money than they were contractually owed. Are you then going to turn around and sign a sweetheart deal with that team to further help them? It’s hard to imagine this being a problem.