Personally I think the debate is flawed because a common definition of 'God' is lacking...if you define God as a big ornery Judeo-Christian MAN with a beard, who is conscious and moral in a very human way...you will have a different debate than if you define God as nature itself (i.e. the sum of all matter+energy or something like that) with a consciousness very different than anything a human could grasp...
Define your terms then have a debate...
FWIW I would rather believe in a flying spaghetti monster with her glorious meatballs than the Judeo Christian God as it is commonly believed today...
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan
"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
|