I wish we could get some insight on what exactly management expects to compete for by maintaining status quo. "Just get in and anything can happen" has worked for this organization exactly once in 35 years, and they didn't even win anything. Like, if you were to place a bet on what is most likely to happen when you run it back with an aging team that already missed the playoffs, does that sound like smart business to anyone except Murray Edwards? Do we need to have more of a wait and see approach for that plan as well?
I honestly don't understand how there can be any rationale for this approach except cynicism. Edwards knows the fans are stupid sheep who will pay for his crappy product no matter what.
|