Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Pot, meet kettle.
I see those possibility as about as realistic as Conroy turning down firsts.
|
Let me break it down:
1. There are posters that are claiming a 1st wasn't on the table absent of evidence (other than point 2).
2. There are also posters (often the same ones) claiming this was Conroy's plan all along (not to take an all futures return).
3. I am saying point 2 doesn't negate 1 and in fact it is possible Conroy took the offer he did over a richer futures only offer. Again, absent of evidence. But I'm not making a definite claim, this is speculation.
4. You're claiming point 3 is unrealistic. But you're using point 2 to support point 1 and what I'm saying is point 2 can be true independently of point 1.