Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Hostility? Trying to fight you? LOL, man. Reeeelax.
Perfect example of people struggling to put in the minimum effort required to understand the point other people are making, though.
You understand what evidence GGG was asking for, right? The outlandish claim someone made he was asking for proof of? And therefore, you understand why not providing that evidence and saying "what more do you need?" as though you had provided anything close to what was requested is... super bizarre, right? The answer obviously being... the evidence he asked for, which you then mocked with "water is wet" when he stated that? haha.
That's all. Nobody is fighting. You just had an oopsie and are getting defensive about it. Just gotta follow the conversation.
|
Speaking of needing to relax - take some of your own advice, geezus. Your tone is unnecessarily inflammatory, in case you haven't picked that up yet.
Of course we want hard evidence like GGG wants; we all do. No one is debating that. I'm suggesting that recent developments just add more and more smoke to this subject, which rationally justifies the need to conduct more independent research and documentation. What more do you want right now? We CAN'T provide more; what we have is whatever is developing in this subject. We may be able to get hard evidence later, however. Congress has created AARO to get to the bottom of this. Enough has happened in this subject that they've stepped in. I think you just have to be patient here.
And to suggest I'm 'struggling' or 'not putting in minimum effort', ironically, is quite a lazy interpretation on your part as well since I've now clarified my position several times, which you seem to just ignore. Pepsi - we are on the same page, chill.