Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
It's a conclusion based on decades of data and study by the military, intelligence, public and private communities. Just because you don't like the conclusion doesn't mean it isn't true. Therein lies the problem. It doesn't fit with your anthropomorphizing of the universe so it must be wrong. Unless we are the top of the food chain, the supreme intelligence, it can't be true. If they are not living, are material in nature, and do not appear to be natural, then they must be manufactured. That infers an involvement of an intelligence. The fact that we have no idea what these things are, how they disobey our primitive understanding of physics, or where they are from clearly supports they were created by a superior intelligence. Or to comply with your binary understanding of things, God pulled them out of his arse.
|
Geez, speaking of straw men...
So you say we have a primitive understanding. To me that is you admitting that it is something we do not understand, which doesn't make it "aliens" anymore than it make it God. You understand this is just god of the gaps, right? "We don't understand it, therefore it must be aliens" is not a credible scientific statement.
And really, this is your conclusion, not the conclusion of all you mention in the first sentence. Just becuase they are investigating, doesn't mean they've concluded they are otherworldly.