Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
No it isn't.
It's a very reasonable approach, and it seems clear that if he doesn't sign, they are ready to pivot.
You want nothing but a full rebuild, and that is all you see. But I see a pretty big change in their stance here.
|
This isn't true, and also has nothing to do with my post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
I don't have a problem with keeping Lindholm (good player), my point is moreso on the Flames needing to set internal deadlines and protect the team.
They need to get this extension agreed to prior to the draft, or trade him at the draft. So we won't really know until July 1st (when the deal can be signed), but if the extension doesn't get announced July 1st I think they've made a mistake.
|