Grusch's claims line up with Bob Lazar's, whose earlier claims overlap with DG's on many points, including the number of alleged craft. And he's been talking about this since the late 80s.
I'm not a big Joe Rogan person, but his interview with Lazar was utterly fascinating, and at no point did he come across like a guy who was fabricating a story or giving inconsistencies or backtracking. He was concise and intelligible recalling these supposed experiences just like you or I would recollect something that really happened.
Grusch's mannerisms in the interview by comparison were a bit suspect since he didn't answer some of the key questions directly, but danced around a yes or no several times, and appeared both animated and rehearsed at times. It was a different vibe from Lazar, and yet there are a lot of consistencies between their claims, which is what's most interesting to me.
The more accounts that come out from govt connected people that are saying more or less the same thing, the more likely it appears that there is something there. Maybe it's not alien craft, but clearly some UAP materials are being studied in a facility somewhere. I just think it's a game of telephone where the truth is being stretched a bit between people who've seen evidence and the people who are bringing claims to the public.
I also think there are efforts being made behind the scenes to discredit people who talk about what they've heard or seen and muddy the believability of their claims. It would be really easy to sabotage these individuals from the inside. You just to feed the public a story that makes them out to potentially be a loonie toon, and most will latch on to that to discredit them simply because it's a much easier explanation to digest.
I certainly am not buying into anything until there's irrefutable evidence, but nevertheless this whole UAP movement and the information trickling out and the debate around that is undeniably fascinating.
|