Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs
No that has nothing to do with his superstar status, never linked the two.
|
You need to be more clear and separate your thoughts into at least different sentences, if not paragraphs. Your sentences appear to state very different things than you’re meaning
[/quote]
Quote:
|
Yes they overperformed in the regular season which was shown in the play-offs where they were poor.
|
So… regular season performance on its own isn’t enough. Playoff performance (outside of making the finals) on its own isn’t enough. Is your bar that they have to be a top performer in both to have a successful season?
Quote:
|
I agree there is no guarantee which is why the team prefers the much less risk approach which still gets them revenue, because revenue more important than winning.
|
It isn’t a “more important” situation. The end goal is of course to win the Stanley Cup and maximize on-ice success. They appear to value playoff success more than regular season success by their past team makeup (tougher players) and words (just get in). Revenue is an added bonus.