Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire
So a possibility exists that Murray's involvement isn't as extreme as some think. Treliving gets all the credit for the good moves, and it seems Murray is taking the hit for all the bad ones.
|
So you counter my point that you are taking too extreme and binary of view by offering up another extreme and binary view?
As many have pointed out, Tree was good at some things and bad at others. Generally he got good value in trades (Hamonic trade being an exception), was good at signing RFAs, and the organization's drafting was better under his tenure.
He had some bad coaching hires, horrible UFA signings and bled too many picks.
I see few people who don't recognize that he had strengths and weaknesses or that are "blaming Murray for all the bad ones" and giving "Tree credit for all the good moves". I think most people here have a more balanced view.