Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
If that’s true wouldn’t it stand to reason that Conroy has the same constraints in place? Guess we’ll know in two weeks
|
That's the rub yes.
What I'm hoping is that Conroy has outlined:
- That the team's past approach has caused them to lose valuable assets for nothing.
- Therefore the organization needs to alter its approach to how it deals with those situations including being more proactive
- Given the current make-up of the team, that likely means moving some of the many pending UFAs
- In doing so there may be an opportunity to get younger and re-build the asset base, to better position the team
- Overall the objective is to make the playoffs next year, but not at the expense of asset management.
Get buy-in for a change in approach focused on asset management, do not try to get buy-in for a "re-build".
Win the fight you can win, not try to win the one you can't.