Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent
As an assistant, being a good developmental guy who knows the x and o's is fine.
For head coach you need a guy that can motivate groups and has a track record of doing so.
Making the AHL playoffs is a pretty low bar and he saw 1 round in 4 years as the guy.
He seems like great assistant coach material. Not sure he's cut out to be the HC. Hopefully am wrong.
|
How do you know he can't? Evaluating coaches isn't the same as evaluating players on the ice. The vast majority of what they do is behind the scenes. The players all were very vocal during exit interviews of what the issues were. If Huska was also part of the problem, he wouldn't be getting hired.