Quote:
One that focused on optimism, workers, and families. Whether it would have worked or not, a lot of his platform was similar to things people liked about the Liberal platform, with a stronger focus on ensuring money went back to people who needed it and controlling Canada’s bloated monopolies in telecom and food and reducing foreign influence in the housing market.
It would be one thing if O’Toole was swapped for someone more likeable, or less hostile and combative, or someone more in-touch with the average Canadian. Instead they chose… PP… who is worse on literally every angle.
And yeah, maybe he would have won if it weren’t for Chinese interference. Are you saying he would have been a bad PM?
|
I know you have several issues with PP, but maybe your bias is also contributing to not see his platform for optimism, workers, and families. You don't like his messaging, or maybe his tact, but it appears to me those core values are his main message. He is constantly speaking about what he believes to be issues with the housing market, both foreign and domestic. I am sure, I have my bias's contribute to how I perceive the liberal government, and I will admit that. When, as in the past, the conservatives win the popular vote it kinda does mean that the majority of Canadians are OK with their political path.