Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays
I really like what I'm hearing from Sec if it reflects the reality of what they're thinking. Gets rid of a bunch of vets who this team can't afford to sign inflated contracts, while getting value, and also allowing a young guy to come in and surprise. I really do believe this board values some of these guys more than we should. Because of age, and the fact we already have an aging core, I now don't think any of Lindholm, Toffoli, Backlund or Tanev should be offered anything beyond 2 years. And because of that alone where some have already sacrificed and already probably have one foot out the door, it's simply time to trade them now or at the deadline to maximize their value. The combo of prospects or picks can really set the Flames up in the future despite having too many guys tied up long term. The possibility of dealing Markstrom's contract is too juicy. He's not paid a killing year to year, and there are desperate GMs out there who could offer something like a 2nd for him and his contract I'd imagine. The possibility of getting good returns for all the above really gives me a hard on. Go Craig!
|
I totally disagree with lumping Lindholm in with those other players. He is 28 and will continue to be an effective two way point producer for another 7-8 years. How has 37 year old Patrice Bergeron looked the last couple of years? Lindholm is a guy you absolutely lock up long term if you can.