Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
This has nothing to do with what I said, but thanks for the lecture on the environment.
I have no problems with a global environmental strategy, Kyoto just ain't it.
Until some of the nations who have used thier own countries as a dumping ground are forced to live up to a equivalent standard to the other developed nations then Kyoto is useless.
There has to be a fair balance between national economic interest and the environment as well.
|
The lecture wasn't for you, just the first bit.
Did you not say it's a handicapper for developed nations? Did I not show you how it wasn't? Why should developing nations pay for the fact that developed nations have screwed over the globe? China would become bound by Kyoto shortly. I believe they were given until 2012 or something? I'd have to double check that.
Fair balance? Why can't it be positive for both?