Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe
What? I haven't called him equally close to anything regarding points, you're confused.
Barkov was chosen because at the time they didn't have a better option. Still doesn't mean that he's a great choice.
|
You said calling him a 115 player is the same as calling him a 55 point player, which is absurd.
And it’s entirely possible they
did have a better choice than Barkov… and chose wrong. You think he was the best choice on the entire team but also a poor choice? Seems Seems unlikely.