Quote:
Originally Posted by NegativeSpace
Should he not be? He just authorized a payment of over $8 million to Sutter to not coach for the next two years. If anything, this gives me more faith that Edwards' involvement is not the problem.
|
I was not offering an opinion one way or the other, I just know it's a key topic for a lot of people around here so wanted to highlight that question and subsequent answer from Maloney.
It's very likely completely innocent, but Maloney actually slipped up a bit in his answer. He talked a bit about how many conversations and how involved Murray is, and sort of trails off with "those who think that he is distant or uninvolved, are SADLY mistaken". This would imply that it's a negative ongoing issue- he likely meant "sorely" mistaken, and it's a common slip so I wouldnt ascribe more to it than that, but it was interesting considering the topic of conversation here is that ownership should butt out.