Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
This thread from a virologist covers that Senate report nicely. Have a read.
blah blah
|
That's great and all for people still clinging to their poorly constructed realities where there should be no coincidence about a mutated coronavirus virus appearing beside a lab with a poor safety record that mutates coronaviruses.
I saw this massive wall of twitter text (worst medium you could ever use for that). Her main point seemed to be that:
1. The font was bad
2. She found some grammar and spelling mistakes.
So. What she actually did, was publish a draft article probably entrusted to her or someone she knew for legitimate feedback. And as soon as the actual article was released, she published the draft article rather than the real one.
That...is...among other things, unethical, unprofessional, childish, and narcisistic considering she did a big big thing on twitter (again why twitter?) last year about she "knew" the truth and how great she was. BTW for anyone who's visited her website, she should not be knocking 1990s websites.
For anyone interested in actually reading the real article (I know, twitter is so much more reliable), it's here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...origins-report
It might help some people to understand why the rest of the world outside of this person's twitter account is starting to take lab safety and regulation a little more seriously now.