[Brendone]

Interesting take from ChatGPT

If all development in a city required a plebiscite, it would significantly change the city's growth and development patterns. A plebiscite is a direct vote in which all the people of a city or country can participate to decide on a specific issue or proposal. In this scenario, any proposed development project would need to be approved by the majority of the citizens through a vote.

Here are some possible effects and characteristics of a city where all development required a plebiscite:

1. Slow growth: The plebiscite would introduce an additional layer of decision-making, which could slow down the growth and development of the city. It would also take longer to implement the decisions made by the plebiscite, as the city's administration would need to wait for the results of the vote before proceeding with any development project.

2. High civic engagement: Since every development project would be subject to a plebiscite, citizens would need to be more involved in the city's governance and decision-making. This could lead to a higher level of civic engagement and participation in the democratic process.

3. Decentralized decision-making: The plebiscite would allow citizens to make decisions on individual development projects, which could lead to a more decentralized decision-making process. Each neighborhood or community could have more say in how their area is developed, and this could lead to a more equitable distribution of resources across the city.

4. Focus on sustainability: The plebiscite could force citizens to prioritize sustainable development projects based on their needs and priorities. This could result in more effective development as the citizens would have a direct say in how the city is developed.

5. Possible NIMBYism: A plebiscite could also result in NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard) as citizens may be reluctant to approve development projects in their neighborhoods, even if they are necessary for the city's growth and prosperity. This could lead to underfunding of important infrastructure projects or public services.

In summary, a city where all development required a plebiscite would be characterized by slow growth, high civic engagement, decentralized decision-making, focus on sustainability, and possible NIMBYism.