One of the reporters mentioned that it is normal that before a deal becomes finalized, there will be things kept confidential if that information might impact other business. Notley's response was that because public money is involved and the period of confidentiality doesn't end until after the election, the public should know all the details before voting.
I can see her point and it is really convenient and likely by design that the UCP timed it like that, but if the deal falls through and it hurts 3rd party business, that wouldn't be good either.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|