[midniteowl]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

She said she couldn't evaluate it because she has no access to details. For the same reason we can't evaluate it. It's an "election issue" but you just have to trust all the politicians and CSEC that everything is fair.


This, for lack of a better term, is bull####. If it's an election issue, you have to give us the details to make an informed decision. Otherwise the only logical assumption to be made is that it is a bad deal, and they are keeping that from us. Unless you are dumb enough to trust Danielle Smith. Nobody, at this point, is that dumb, though, are they?

So is it smart to trust Rachel Notley? Honest question.