Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing
The City is not spending 1.2 billion dollars on an arena, and to say it is doing so is disingenuous.
|
I think my previous posts indicating or acknowledging the funding split should be enough to avoid being called disingenuous, and you’re usually pretty fair so I take offence. I was just lazy with my words.
To rephrase with precise language in search of some sort of answer: can anyone name one city-led project totalling over or even around $1 billion with the majority of it being publicly funded that would be an example of a “worse way” to spend the money?