Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan
Sharp was very clear that the vast majority of the city contribution was already allocated to this project. I'm just using her words. It's likely true because the deal was already approved and then rescinded. So, it's likely they were obligated to spend this toward some sort of project around a facility.
So yeah, the money was already spent.
|
I’m sure the city accountants are all super relieved that they don’t have figure out how to deal with a changing timeline on a capital budget allocation because that sounds like it’s probably unprecedented and impossible and the only other option would be to light the money on fire in a city furnace somewhere but then they’d spend a dollar less on the gas bill which they already precisely budgeted because they do budget zero and that change would ruin everything so maybe they’ll have to hire an engineer to determine how much to turn the thermostat up to offset the difference but then another accountant has to figure out how much cash to keep out of the furnace to pay for the engineer but this task wasn’t anticipated so the accountant might get a half hour of overtime which will make her boss commit seppuku because her department failed to achieve budget zero.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk