Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyB
I didn't think the hit was bad apart from being late, and it was obviously very, very late. Maybe he could get a game, but it wasn't a hit in the numbers or anything like that. I feel like we see stuff more or less as dirty all the time. If there's a suspension, it's just because of the injury.
|
And the fact there was no reason whatsoever to make that hit to a guy without the puck. The puck as someone else said, wasn't even in the same time zone.
It wasn't reactionary, but a deliberate action against a defenseless player.
It was a bad look that the refs decided not to give him 5 and a game after it happened.
He deserves at least 2 games, imo.