Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
You asked about why 2 million isn’t the line and I explained it to you. You are no longer discussing this in good faith.
So you would intervene if they controlled the majority of wealth? 50.01% is your like for the top 100 hundred Canadians. Why not 45%? See I can play this game to.
I don’t think you you read any of my posts if you think the summary is rich bad.
|
Not trying to be in bad faith, just making the point that there can be a different arbitrary number and you explained that, same as the $100M number. The number moves depending on perspective. I have always enjoyed our discussions and they have always enjoyed polite and informative.
Didn't set an intervention level. Just the perspective that prior to Industrialization the wealth gap was even greater. I just happen to believe that we (society in general) need these people to change the world and in most cases in a positive way..
I have read your posts and definitely sense the undertone that anyone ultra rich
Is seen In a negative light.