[Saqe]

Originally Posted by Frequitude

It changes from rotating up-down to side-side. The ability to see it hit the stick is inconclusive, but it conclusively had to have hit the stick.

https://twitter.com/josheggy/status/1649647216238252032

https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comm...puck_rotation/

That's why I find it odd that smarmy Woodcroft resorted to such a stupid argument. What an insufferable personality.

Perhaps this is why it got upheld though. Haven't seen a replay extend this far.

It's kind of like when a puck is in the goalie's pads and that pad is in the crease, if they can't see the puck in the pads they can't call it a goal. They need to see it. In this case you can't see the stick hitting the puck. So hey, maybe Newton's first law could be fallible