Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ
Except it isn’t conclusively a high stick or it would have been overturned. The puck doesn’t change rotation in every video I have seen.
|
It changes from rotating up-down to side-side. The ability to
see it hit the stick is inconclusive, but it conclusively
had to have hit the stick.
https://twitter.com/josheggy/status/1649647216238252032
https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comm...puck_rotation/
That's why I find it odd that smarmy Woodcroft resorted to such a stupid argument. What an insufferable personality.
Perhaps this is why it got upheld though. Haven't seen a replay extend this far.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major
Doesn't it hit ekholm's ass on the way down to the ice anyway?
|