Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
But based on that reporting the word “allegedly” appears. So as long as they can demonstrate that CSIS believed this they may have cover provided they followed reasonable journalistic standards.
This is likely why paragraph 5 is worded the way it is. Rather than saying that CSIS didn’t allege these things to global it’s saying global was irresponsible in reporting them.
One thing is clear is his defense isn’t all these things are false.
|
He does not need a defence, Global does. That is Defamation 101. He has already proved beyond a shadow of doubt that they have defamed him.
Maybe truthiness is a defence that Global wants to try.
And for Firebot he has a slam dunk defamation case. Comments made that were about a person, that were defamatory and that were told to more than one person.
Over to you Global to justify it.