Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
I don't think that most of the MLAs are Wildrose by another name though. For example, my current MLA is useless and done almost nothing that I can see during this term, but if I had to guess she probably supported Toews during the leadership. I've talked to her and I don't get the impression that she's personally that far to the right. At the same time though, she wants to be re-elected, so so she can't very well come out swinging against the party leader?
|
But they are as long as they're supporting the current version of the UCP and running under their banner. This is Smith's and TBA's party, and they're along for the ride for cushy jobs. These MLA's are passively supporting what they do, even if they don't want to advertise Danielle Smith's face.
They're sheep.
Again, if they came out and said they're representing the Wildrose party by another name, I'd have more respect for them.