Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
We just keep having the same argument.
Now you're bringing in untold analysts to back up a theory that has no factual data.
Every team turns the puck over. When they do they end up with either shots in close (they're counted) or odd man chances that create high danger chances (they're counted).
There is no evidence that the Flames have found a way to be higher danger than high danger.
And even if they were ... lets give you that for fun for a second ... do you really think they've found a way to be so much worse in generating high danger against than the average high danger chance that it excuses goaltenders that are ranked 29th in the league in save percentage?
Seriously?
|
There is evidence. It’s on the ice in front of us all, game in and game out
But it’s not simple things that are measured and are factored in to models
I point again to wondering why the goalies are so much more effective behind Backlund who is +20 than behind Kadri who is -18?
The system works, some guys don’t want to do the hard things that make a difference imo